Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

388 F.3d 137

Docket No. 04-50901.

Nader v. Connor

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

October 6, 2004.

2 counsel of record

Relies on Nader v. Connor

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 2004-10-06

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2024

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

40200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

James Carter Linger (argued), Tulsa, OK, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Edward Donald Burbach (argued), Kathlyn C. Wilson, Matthew F. Stowe, Austin, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas; Lee Yeakel, Judge.

Before DeMOSS, DENNIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Plaintiffs-Appellants Ralph Nader, et al., appeal from the district court's decision denying their First and Fourteenth Amendment constitutional challenges to the Texas Election Code, specifically sections 192.32(a), 192.32(b)(3)(A), 192.32(c), and 192.32(d). Essentially for the reasons as well stated in the district court's memorandum opinion, Nader v. Connor, 332 F.Supp.2d 982 (W.D.Tex.2004), we AFFIRM that court's final judgment declaring the challenged Texas Election Code provisions legal and constitutional.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/388/f3d/137 · .json · Public domain