Kaur v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
388 F.3d 734 · 2004
Citation profile
13 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently September 2022 · most notably Soto-Olarte v. Holder (2009), Lopez-Umanzor v. Gonzales (2005)
13 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Zadvydas v. Davis · Department of the Interior and Bureau of Indian Affairss v. Klamath Water Users Protective Association · Hartooni v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Pankaj Karan Singh Kataria v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Agyeman v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We will grant a petition for review from a BIA decision on due process grounds if the proceeding was so fundamentally unfair that the alien was prevented from reasonably presenting [his or her] case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he IJ was not entitled to prejudge [the son's] credibility or the probative value of his testimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.