Johnson v. Weinberger’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 402 (§ 202 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 416 (§ 216 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Henry v. Gardner · Gotshaw v. Ribicoff · Jeralds v. Richardson · Ingram v. Richardson · Payne v. Weinberger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““1. clinical findings of treating and examining physicians on the existence of medically determinable physical or mental impairment; “2. opinions of treating or examining physicians on subsidiary questions of fact relating to the severity of the medically determinable impairment; “3. testimony of the claimant, corroborated by his family and neighbors concerning the effect of the medically determinable impairment; “4. evidence of the claimant’s educational background, work history and present age.” 388 F.Supp. at 780-81 . 2”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.