Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 388 NW2D 872 - State v. Moeller

State v. Moeller’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1989
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Russell · Sorrells v. United States · Hampton v. United States · Public Broadcasting Service v. Network Project · United States v. Twigg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`undue, prolonged or persistent pressures were exerted against him, ... that this inducement was dangled in front of him'[,] ... or that he was `played upon'....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the inducement of one to commit a crime not contemplated by him for the mere purpose of instituting criminal proceedings against him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The defendant must show police inducement to commit the crime and that he was not predisposed to commit the specific criminal act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.