McGuigen Estate’s Empirical Analysis
1957
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently July 1981 · most notably Matter of Estate of Cavill (1974), Listino v. Union Paving Co. (1956)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Newlin Estate · Orlosky v. Haskell · National Transit Co. v. Boardman · Commonwealth Ex Rel. Shumaker v. New York & Pennsylvania Co. · Tarlo's Estate
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(1) Death within thirty days. — Religious and charitable gifts. Any bequest or devise for religious or charitable purposes included in a will or codicil executed within thirty days of the death of the testator shall be invalid unless all who would benefit by its invalidity agree that it shall be valid. The thirty-day period shall be so computed as to include the day on which the will or codicil is written and to exclude the day of death. Unless the testator directs otherwise, if such a will or codicil shall revoke or supersede a prior will or codicil executed at least thirty days before the testator’s death, and not theretofore revoked or superseded and the original of which can be produced in legible condition, and if each instrument shall contain an identical gift for substantially the same religious or charitable purpose, the gift in the later will or codicil shall be valid; or if each instrument shall give for substantially the same religious or charitable purpose a cash legacy or a share of the residuary estate or a share of the same asset, payable immediately or subject to identical prior estates and condi tions, the later gift shall be valid to the extent to which it shall not exceed the prior gift.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Pearl Estate · Kerr Estate““When an act is changed or repealed and a new or similar act enacted to take its place, or when the words or meaning of a statute are not explicit or clear, the intention of the legislature is to be gathered not only by a consideration of the new act but also by examining the occasion, reason or necessity for the law; the circumstances under which it was enacted; the mischief, if any, to be remedied; the object to be obtained; and the old law upon the subject. Phipps v. Kirk, 333 Pa. 478 , 5 A. 2d 143 ; Orlosky v. Haskell, 304 Pa. 57, 66 , 155 A. 112 . “Moreover, in ascertaining the legislative meaning, while what is said in debate is not relevant, the report of a legislative commission or a Senate or House committee may, if obscurity or ambiguity exists, be considered: National Transit Co. v. Boardman, 328 Pa. 450 , 197 A. 239 ; Tarlo’s Estate, 315 Pa. 321 , 172 A. 139 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kerr Estate“"The basic purpose of the 30 day requirement was and is to prevent a testator during his last illness from being importuned or otherwise influenced, by hope of reward or fear of punishment in the hereafter, to leave his estate in whole or in part to charity or to church."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.