Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 388 Pa. Super. 22 - Commonwealth v. Jones

388 Pa. Super. 22 - Commonwealth v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 2009
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Ellerman Lines, Ltd. · Molinaro v. New Jersey · Commonwealth v. Passaro · Commonwealth v. Galloway · 289 Pa. Super. 126 - Commonwealth v. Harrison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “no discretion to consider an appeal by a convicted defendant who escapes or absconds from the jurisdiction, regardless of when he returns.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the factual distinctions between Galloway and Passaro would still suggest that the forfeiture analysis of Passaro would not apply to situations ... where the defendant was returned to Pennsylvania authorities while their appeals were still pending”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.