Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 388 S.C. 469 - State v. Mattison

State v. Mattison’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

33 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Washington · State v. Kelsey · State v. Pittman · Sheppard v. State · State v. Burkhart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An appellate court will not reverse the trial judge's decision regarding a jury charge absent an abuse of discretion.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'[t]o warrant reversal, a trial judge's refusal to give a requested jury charge must be both erroneous and prejudicial to the defendant.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'The law to be charged must be determined from the evidence presented at trial.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.