Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 388 SO2D 128 - Martin v. Esponge

Martin v. Esponge’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
January 2013
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 2013

5 state decisions

301980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Juneau v. Laborde · Moreira v. Schwan · 246 So. 2d 313 - Ree Corporation v. Shaffer · 338 So. 2d 126 - Tri Parish Heating & Air Conditioning v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The appellant is not prejudiced by a trial judge's limiting his proffer to a statement setting forth the nature of the evidence rather than allowing him to make a complete record thereof, since the appellate court will remand for completion of the record if, in the former case, the evidence excluded is ruled admissible. [Emphasis added.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.