Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 388 So. 2d 141 - Baugh v. State

388 So. 2d 141 - Baugh v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2002
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Warn v. State · 328 So. 2d 355 - Saucier v. State · Aldridge v. State · Jones v. State · Dooley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The closing argument was not taken in shorthand by the court reporter. A tape recorder was used, but most of the argument was inaudible. That part which could be transcribed is questionable as to whether or not it constituted a comment on appellant's failure to testify, and it appeared to be in answer to argument of appellant's counsel.... [T]he Court [has] held that such a comment must clearly appear from the record. There was no request for, or attempt to construct, a special bill of exceptions to show what was said and done. On the record, there is no way for this Court to consider that assignment, it not having been preserved for our consideration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.