Porter v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2002
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 109 So. 2d 7 - Singer v. State · Cooper v. Pitchess · 116 So. 2d 626 - Piccott v. State · Piccott v. Florida
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While the parties are entitled to have qualified jurors serve, they are not entitled to any particular juror. Piccott v. State, 116 So.2d 626 (Fla.1960), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 293 , 81 S.Ct. 106 , 5 L.Ed.2d 83 (1960). Since an alternate juror was present to whom appellant had not objected, the trial court did not err in exercising its discretion in removing juror number one.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Chavers v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.