¶1Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that petitioner is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed. See: Mitchell v. State, 167 So.2d 27 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964); Johnson v. State, 183 So.2d 862 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); Wedenfeller v. State, 355 So.2d 193 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).
388 So. 2d 34
Harrington v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 16, 1980
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1980-09-16
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 2010
1 state decisions
Relies on Mitchell v. State · Kovschak v. State · Johnson v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1980-09-16
View the full empirical analysis of this case →