Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

388 So. 2d 383

Docket No. 66985.

State v. Marcantel

STATE of Louisiana v. Steve MARCANTEL and Delouis Guillory.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 10, 1980.

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1980-09-10

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 2007

8 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“"Section 17. A criminal case in which the punishment may be capital shall be tried before a jury of twelve persons, all of whom must concur to render a verdict. A case in which the punishment is necessarily confinement at hard labor shall be tried before a jury of twelve persons, ten of whom must concur to render a verdict. A case in which the punishment may be confinement at hard labor or confinement without hard labor for more than six months shall be tried before a jury of six persons ..."”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 438 So. 2d 1208 - State v. Pollard

Relies on 364 So. 2d 588 - State v. Nedds · 367 So. 2d 857 - State v. Smith

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1980-09-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., William Pucheu, Dist. Atty., A. Bruce Rozas and Richard W. Vidrine, Asst. Dist. Attys., for plaintiff-appellee.

¶2Guy O. Mitchell, Ville Platte, for Steve Marcantel, defendant-appellant.

¶3John Saunders, Ville Platte, for Delouis Guillory, defendant-appellant.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Defendants Steve Marcantel and Delouis Guillory were charged by bill of information with the crimes of simple burglary, La.R.S. 14:62, and theft, La.R.S. 14:67, committed on November 6, 1978. Thereafter, they were tried before a twelve person jury, which found them guilty as charged. The trial court sentenced each defendant to serve ten years at hard labor on the burglary charge and six years at hard labor on the theft charge, the sentences to run consecutively. Defendants now appeal, relying upon eight assignments of error. Because we find merit to assignment of error number four, relative to the improper composition of the jury, we pretermit consideration of the remainder.

¶6Article I, Section 17 of the 1974 Louisiana Constitution provides that "[a] case in *384 which the punishment may be confinement at hard labor or confinement without hard labor for more than six months shall be tried before a jury of six persons ..." See also, La.C.Cr.P. Art. 782.

¶7Both crimes with which these defendants were charged were punishable with or without hard labor, La.R.S. 14:62 and La.R.S. 14:67; consequently by constitutional mandate, they were triable before a six person jury. For the reasons assigned in State v. Smith,367 So.2d 857 (La.1979), defendants' convictions and sentences are reversed, and the case is remanded to the district court for a new trial.

¶8REVERSED.

¶9DENNIS and LEMMON, JJ., dissent. See State v. Nedds,364 So.2d 588 (La.) (Dissenting opinion).

/388/so2d/383 · .json · Public domain