Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 388 SO2D 495 - Morgan v. State

Morgan v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 2011

13 state decisions

801980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. State · Stone v. McKay Plumbing Co. · 298 So. 2d 716 - Toney v. State · 183 So. 2d 908 - Phillips v. State · Morgan v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the failure of either party to examine a witness equally accessible to both is not a proper subject for comment before a jury by either of the parties.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “... provided, however, a person convicted of aggravated assault upon a law enforcement officer or fireman while such law enforcement officer or fireman is acting within the scope of his duty and office shall be punished by a fine of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) or by imprisonment for not more than thirty (30) years, or both.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The district attorney in his closing argument should not have argued: "Where is this pie in the sky person named Pieshot? Why has the person named Pieshot not come forward to testify today for the defendant?"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.