¶1Rejecting the appellant-husband’s only point on appeal, we find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s award of his interest in the marital home to the wife as lump sum alimony. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Rosen v. Rosen, 386 So.2d 1268 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Creel v. Creel, 378 So.2d 1251 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).
¶2Affirmed.