Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 388 SO2D 679 - State v. Baldwin

State v. Baldwin’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently January 2016

14 state decisions

701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Bailey · Foster v. California · Burton S. Knapp v. John P. Kinsey · 350 So. 2d 615 - State v. Sheppard · State v. Sonnier

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Some relevant factors in determining whether to change venue are (1) the nature of the pretrial publicity and the particular degree to which it has circulated in the community, (2) the connection of government officials with the release of the publicity, (3) the length of the time between the dissemination of the publicity and the trial, (4) the severity and notoriety of the offense, (5) the area from which the jury is to be drawn, (6) other events occurring in the community which either affect or reflect the attitude of the community or individual jurors toward the defendant, and (7) any factors likely to affect the candor and veracity of the prospective jurors on voir dire."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`is charged to see that the law is properly administered, and it is a duty which he can not discharge by remaining inert.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “have a duty to remain impartial and neutral, judges are not merely umpires or moderators.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.