Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 388 SO2D 688 - State v. Hartman

State v. Hartman’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
2
states following
December 2001
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently December 2001 · most notably 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall (1988), State v. Shapiro (1983)

33 state decisions

250198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Gregg v. Georgia · Witherspoon v. Illinois · 360 So. 2d 500 - State v. Drew · 380 So. 2d 1361 - State v. Goode

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"Second degree murder is the killing of a human being: (1) When the offender has a specific intent to kill or to inflict great bodily harm; or (2) When the offender is engaged in the perpetration or attempted perpetration of aggravated rape, aggravated arson, aggravated burglary, aggravated kidnapping, aggravated escape, armed robbery, or simply robbery, even though he has no intent to kill or to inflict great bodily harm. Whoever commits the crime of second degree murder shall be punished by life imprisonment at hard labor without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Louisiana jurisprudence has not limited impeachment testimony to recent crimes, nor to crimes indicative of the credibility of the testifying defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.