Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 388 SO2D 722 - State v. Holmes

State v. Holmes’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

143
cited by 143 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 136 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 143 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2018 · most notably Gonzales v. Duenas-Alvarez (2007), 851 So. 2d 921 - State v. Tate (2003)

5 federal appellate · 136 state decisions

5001980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Gregg v. Georgia · 383 So. 2d 369 - State v. Williams · 343 So. 2d 712 - State v. Elzie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 143 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “All persons concerned in the commission of a crime, whether present or absent, and whether they directly commit the act constituting the offense, aid and abet in its commission, or directly or indirectly counsel or procure another to commit the crime, are principals.”
    24 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Williams v. Maggio · State v. McDermitt
  2. “[A]n individual may only be convicted as a principal for those crimes for which he personally has the requisite mental state.”
    24 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Flowers v. Blackburn · State v. Smith
  3. “that state of mind which exists when the circumstances indicate that the offender actively desired the prescribed criminal consequences to follow his act or failure to act.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Runyon · State v. Hall

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.