Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

388 S.W.2d 200

Washington v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 6, 1965

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1965-01-06

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1965-01-06

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently November 1991

5 state decisions

301965197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

McDONALD, Presiding Judge

¶1(dissenting)-

¶2In deciding a question raised by the record on appeal the appellate court will, as nearly as possible, place itself in the position of the trial judge when testing the ruling made by him.

¶3When the written statement was offered in evidence by the state, the appellant asked and was permitted to examine on voir dire the officer to whom it was made, as shown by the original opinion. No request was then made to offer any further evidence on the issue of the voluntary nature of the statement.

¶4I am not aware of any case where the the accused did not testify, as in this case, that custody and interrogation, alone, of an accused were sufficient to require that the .issue of the voluntary nature of his written statement be submitted to the jury.

¶5I respectfully dissent.

/388/sw2d/200 · .json · Public domain