Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 388 S.W.2d 291 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 1996
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pearson v. State · Brazos River Conservation & Reclamation District v. Allen · McElyea v. Parker · Thompson v. Janes · Denton County v. Brammer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Wjhere either party in a condemnation proceeding properly perfects an appeal to the County Court and the opposite party thereafter properly joins issue, neither party has a right, without the consent of the other, to withdraw the appeal and to proceed to judgment based on the award of the Commissioners. The Statute contemplates a right of a trial by the court and jury on the issue of damages as well as the right to condemn, provided such issues are properly raised, and this right cannot be destroyed by the action of the opposite party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.