State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 54 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently November 2012 · most notably MBM FINANCIAL v. Woodlands Operating Co. (2009), Amason v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. (1984)
2 federal appellate · 54 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pearson v. State · City of San Antonio v. Grandjean · State v. Nelson · Thomas v. Housing Authority of City of Dallas · McConnico v. Texas Power & Light Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“After an award has been made, and the money deposited in the registry of the court and the landowner has withdrawn the same, he cannot thereafter contend that the taking was unlawful.”
12 later decisions quote this exact passage“claim of inadequate damages * * * the rule in * * * Grandjean * * * would otherwise appear to be good law: `In cases in which there has been an attempt to condemn, but the proceedings are invalid for want of a compliance with the statute which authorized the condemnation, it is held that the owner, by accepting the condemnation assessed, makes the transaction effectual. " (Emphasis added.) In the Luby case, among other defects alleged, it was contended that the city, as the condemning authority, had failed to state " the purpose for which the land will be used, concerning which there was a discrepancy between the Statement and the resolutions of the City Council * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.