¶1(dissenting).
¶2I am unable to agree that the complained of remarks of counsel for the state were so obviously prejudicial as to require the trial court to declare a mistrial. See Baker v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 368 S.W.2d 627, 631.
388 S.W.2d 946
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided March 17, 1965
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1965-03-17
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently August 2014
3 state decisions
Relies on Baker v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1965-03-17
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1(dissenting).
¶2I am unable to agree that the complained of remarks of counsel for the state were so obviously prejudicial as to require the trial court to declare a mistrial. See Baker v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 368 S.W.2d 627, 631.