Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 389 F.2d 108 - Lowe v. United States

Lowe v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

389 F.2d 108 · 1968

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
July 1999
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently July 1999

18 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

1401968197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1343

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Lutwak v. United States · United States v. Trenton Potteries Co. · Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Northeast Airlines, Inc. · General Reinsurance Corp. v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “«* * * [E]ven if it be assumed that the trial court erred in receiving the objected to testimony * * * a substantial injury to the rights of the accused must appear before a judgment will be reversed for the erroneous admission of evidence. Lutwak v. United States, 344 U.S. 604 , 73 S.Ct. 481 , 97 L.Ed. 593 (1953); National Dairy Products Corporation v. United States, 384 F.2d 457 (8th Cir.1967); Cotton v. United States, 361 F.2d 673 (8th Cir.1966); Myres v. United States, 174 F.2d 329 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 849 , 70 S.Ct. 91 , 94 L.Ed. 520 (1949) * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.