Dickerson v. Gantz

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Feb. 7, 1968.

Rehearing Denied March 26, 1968.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1968-02-07

2 counsel of record

Relies on United States to the Use of Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Company v. Markowitz Brothers, Inc. And Continental Casualty Company

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1968-02-07

¶1M. Ashley Dickerson (argued), Anchorage, Alaska, in pro. per.

¶2W. C. Arnold (argued), Anchorage, Alaska, for appellee.

¶3Before CHAMBERS, JERTBERG and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM:

¶5Appellant is an Anchorage lawyer. At one time state grievance proceedings were pending against her. They have been dismissed by stipulation. She has a certificate of good standing now. And, the old proceedings are dead.

¶6Yet, she still pursues a district attorney and members of the state bar committee on various theories for their fruitless efforts. On motion, her complaint was dismissed and she appeals.

¶7We have reviewed the record and find no ruling of the district court clearly erroneous.

¶8Affirmed.