Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 389 F.2d 514 - Hardy Rosenthall v. C. Murray Henderson, Warden

Hardy Rosenthall v. C. Murray Henderson, Warden’s Empirical Analysis

389 F.2d 514 · 1968

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
October 1999
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 2 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1999 · most notably Schneckloth v. Bustamonte (1973), United States v. Colbert (1973)

22 federal appellate · 2 district · 10 state decisions

2901968197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Johnson v. Zerbst · Fahy v. Connecticut · United States v. Page · 255 F. Supp. 268 - United States v. Blalock

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[C]onsent to a search, in order to be voluntary, must be unequivocal, specific and intelligently given, uncontaminated by any duress or coercion, and is not lightly to be inferred.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. United States v. Thurman · Guidry v. State
  2. “"The failure to advise the defendant of his right to withhold consent is only one factor to be considered." (Emphasis added.) Id. 389 F.2d, page 516.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Hohnke v. Commonwealth · Government of the Virgin Islands v. Berne
  3. ““[B]efore a federal constitutional error can be held harmless, the court must be able to declare a belief that it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Keener v. Tennessee

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.