Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 389 F.2d 882 - Dow v. Baird

Dow v. Baird’s Empirical Analysis

389 F.2d 882 · 1968

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
3
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably Simer v. Rios (1981), Judson Atkinson Candies, Inc. v. Latini-Hohberger Dhimantec (2008)

18 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

100196819701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““To achieve the obviously desirable end of finality Rule 60(a) limits the power of district courts to give relief from judgments of its own initiative only to correct clerical mistakes and errors arising from oversight or omission upon such notice, if any, as the court may direct. There were no such errors in the original judgment in this case. Other errors in judgments, as for mistake, inadvertence, excusable neglect, newly discovered evidence, fraud and so forth can be corrected only on motion and on such terms as are just. Rule 60(b) Fed.R.Civ.P. Thus the only errors in a judgment which a district court may correct of its own initiative are those sanctioned by Rule 60(a), supra, that is, formal errors arising from clerical mistakes and from oversight or omission. Other errors, such as those enumerated in Rule 60(b) can be corrected only on motion . . . .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “cavalierly brushed aside as an empty formality,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.