Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

389 F.2d 91

Docket No. 21776.

King v. Nelson

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

January 16, 1968.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1968-01-16

2 counsel of record

Relies on Marvin S. Hartley, Receiver of Thompson Banking Company of Wrens, Georgia v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1968-01-16

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 1991

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

501968197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Wilson E. King, Nolan D. Wimberley, pro se, for appellant.

Thomas Lynch, Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, MERRILL and ELY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

The motion for a writ of mandamus is treated as a motion for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus. As such, it is denied.

¶2

The judgment dismissing the complaint is affirmed. We conclude that the facts alleged do not show that appellants were denied reasonable access to the courts.

/389/f2d/91 · .json · Public domain