Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 389 F.2d 911 - Loux v. United States

Loux v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

389 F.2d 911 · 1968

Citation profile

219
cited by 219 later decisions
25
states following
January 2022
most recently cited

147 federal appellate · 3 district · 44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 219 later decisions — most recently January 2022 · most notably United States v. Baker (1993), Tillman v. United States (1969)

147 federal appellate · 3 district · 44 state decisions — followed in 25 states

12701968197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1201 (International Parental Kidnapping Crime Act of 1993) · 18 U.S.C. § 3432

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · Costello v. United States · Wade v. Hunter · Dennis v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 219 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “left to the sound discretion of the judge,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “exclusive access to a storehouse of relevant fact.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““The law does not require that the testimony of witnesses before a grand jury be recorded or transcribed. Rule 6(d), F.R.Crim.P. is permissive, not mandatory. Every court that has considered the question has so held. United States v. Caruso, 2 Cir., 1966, 358 F.2d 184 , 186; United States v. Cianchetti, 2 Cir., 1963, 315 F.2d 584 , 591; United States v. Martel, D.C.N. Y„ 1954, 17 F.R.D. 326 (cited with approval in Cianchetti, supra); United States v. Hensley, 6 Cir., 1967, 374 F.2d 341 , 352; Welch v. United States, 10 Cir., 1966, 371 F.2d 287 , 291. Nor is there support for the claim that failure to record grand jury testimony violates the defendants’ constitutional rights. United States v. Cianchetti, supra, and United States v. Hensley, supra, are to the contrary. See also Lawn v. United States, 1958, 355 U.S. 339 , 349-350, 78 S.Ct. 311 , 2 L.Ed.2d 321 ; Costello v. United States, 1956, 350 U.S. 359 , 76 S.Ct. 406 , 100 L.Ed. 397 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.