Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

389 F.2d 93

Docket No. 21669.

Pacheco v. Carberry

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Jan. 16, 1968.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1968-01-16

2 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Ventresca

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1968-01-16

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently May 2008 · most notably United States v. Lipscomb (1970), United States v. Gravitt (1973)

23 federal appellate · 1 district · 13 state decisions — followed in 10 states

30019681970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Edward L. Cragen (argued), James S. Pacheco, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

¶2Carl S. Mayer, Deputy Atty. Gen., (argued), Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, Robert R. Granucci, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal.,- for appellees.

¶3Before CHAMBERS, POPE and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM:

¶5Appellant’s petition for a writ of habe-as corpus was dismissed in the district court. He appeals.

¶6One of his points is appropriate for decision here now. That is his attack on the state search warrant and the fruits thereof. We find the warrant on the facts here not infirm, but valid under United States v. Ventresca, 380 U.S. 102, 85 S.Ct. 741, 13 L.Ed.2d 684.

¶7As to all other points raised here, we find Pacheco has not exhausted his state remedies.

¶8Affirmed.

/389/f2d/93 · .json · Public domain