Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 389 F.3d 1191 - Klay v. All

Klay v. All’s Empirical Analysis

389 F.3d 1191 · 2004

Citation profile

83
cited by 83 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 83 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2021 · most notably Schiavo Schindler v. Schiavo W (2005), United States v. Jordan (2005)

20 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

440200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers · Mitsubishi Motors Corporation v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc · Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp. · Volt Information Sciences Inc v. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “arbitrable claims predominate or whether the outcome of the nonarbitrable claims will depend upon the arbitrator's decision,” the Second Circuit has stated that a stay is appropriate where”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “legal constraints external to the parties' agreement foreclosed arbitration.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “arbitration is a matter of contract [and] the FAA's strong proarbitration policy only applies to disputes that the parties have agreed to arbitrate.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.