United States v. Glenn’s Empirical Analysis
389 F.3d 283 · 2004
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 851 (§ 411 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on United States v. Olano · Blakely v. Washington · United States v. Diaz · Charlesbank Equity Fund II v. Blinds To Go, Inc. · Siciliano v. Vose
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a curative instruction is promptly given, a mistrial is warranted only in rare circumstances implying extreme prejudice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“reasoned consideration of the ineffective assistance claim,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.