Moussa v. Jenifer’s Empirical Analysis
389 F.3d 550 · 2004
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 8 U.S.C. § 1151 (§ 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Enrico St Cyr · Janet Reno, Attorney General v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee et al. · Zadvydas v. Davis · Harris v. Nelson · Department of the Interior and Bureau of Indian Affairss v. Klamath Water Users Protective Association
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] denial of a stay of deportation is a component of the decision to execute a deportation order.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“no court shall have jurisdiction to hear any cause or claim by or on behalf of any alien arising from the decision or action by the [Secretary of DHS] to commence proceedings, adjudicate cases, or execute removal orders against any alien.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jimenez v. Nielsen“directly part of a decision to execute a removal order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jimenez v. Nielsen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.