Bieghler v. McBride’s Empirical Analysis
389 F.3d 701 · 2004
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Doyle v. Ohio · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[The jury obviously accepted Brook's testimony, warts and all, and it is not our place to second-guess that assessment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bieghler v. State“substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury’s verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Taylor v. Bradley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.