Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 389 F.3d 758 - Hall v. Babb

Hall v. Babb’s Empirical Analysis

389 F.3d 758 · 2004

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
January 2021
most recently cited

7 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently January 2021

7 federal appellate ·

150200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Elrod v. Burns · Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois · Tomczak v. City of Chicago · Cusson-Cobb v. O'Lessker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “under the Mt. Healthy burden-shifting mechanism applicable to a First Amendment political discrimination claim, the burden of persuasion itself passes to the defendant-employer once the plaintiff produces sufficient evidence from which the fact finder reasonably can infer that the plaintiffs protected conduct was a “substantial” or “motivating” factor behind her dismissal. Accordingly, once the burden of persuasion shifts to the defendant-employer, the plaintiff-employee will prevail unless the fact finder concludes that the defendant has produced enough evidence to establish that the plaintiffs dismissal would have occurred in any event for nondiscriminatory reasons.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “although these may suggest deficiencies in the selection process, they do not suggest that the defendants made the hiring decision on the basis of politics.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.