Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 389 F.3d 802 - Enlow v. Salem-Keizer Yellow Cab Co.

Enlow v. Salem-Keizer Yellow Cab Co.’s Empirical Analysis

389 F.3d 802 · 2004

Citation profile

76
cited by 76 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
January 2023
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 10 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 76 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2023 · most notably Diaz v. Eagle Produce Ltd. Partnership (2008), Poland v. Chertoff (2007)

9 federal appellate · 10 district ·

470200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United States · Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Thurston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he employee must first establish a prima facie case of age discrimination. If the employee has justified a presumption of discrimination, the burden shifts to the employer to articulate a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for its adverse employment action. If the employer satisfies its burden, the employee must then prove that the reason advanced by the employer constitutes mere pretext for unlawful discrimination.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Direct evidence, in the context of an ADEA claim, is defined as evidence of conduct or statements by persons involved in the decision-making process that may be viewed as directly reflecting the alleged discriminatory attitude ... sufficient to permit the fact finder to infer that that attitude was more likely than not [the cause of] the employer's decision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Disparate treatment is demonstrated when the employer simply treats some people less favorably than others because of [a protected characteristic].” Id. (internal marks and quotation marks omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.