Tuan Thai v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
389 F.3d 967 · 2004
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently July 2020
4 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Salerno · Kansas v. Hendricks · Shaughnessy v. United States Ex Rel. Mezei · Foucha v. Louisiana · Zadvydas v. Davis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he Court's method of narrowing [ § 1231(a)(6) in Zadvydas ] is not the only permissible one.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“An alien ordered removed [1] who is inadmissible ... [2] [or] removable [as a result of violations of status requirements or entry conditions, violations of criminal law, or reasons of security or foreign policy] or [3] who has been determined by the Attorney General to be a risk to the community or unlikely to comply with the order of removal, may be detained beyond the removal period and, if released, shall be subject to [certain] terms of supervision....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.