Gaskin v. Pennsylvania’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1401 · 20 U.S.C. § 1412 · 20 U.S.C. § 1414 · 29 U.S.C. § 794
Relies on City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell Corporation · General Motors Corporation Pick-Up Truck Fuel Tank Products Liability Litigation 94-1064 94-1194 94-1195 94-1198 94-1202 94-1203 94-1207 94-1208 94-1219 · In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices Litigation · Girsh v. Jepson · Oberti v. Board Of Education
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Plaintiffs claimed that Defendants violated: (1) the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. §§ MOO-1485, by failing to identify disabled students, develop individual education programs or plans (“IEPs”), and provide a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”) in the least restrictive environment (“LRE”) to the maximum extent reasonably possible; (2) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, as amended by 29 U.S.C. § 794 , by excluding disabled students, solely because of their disability, from participating in or from receiving the benefits of any program that received federal funding; and (3) Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12131-12134 , by excluding otherwise qualified students from access to public programs solely because of their disability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“All present and future school age students with disabilities in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania who have been denied the option of receiving a free appropriate education in regular classrooms with individualized supportive services, or have been placed in regular education classrooms without the supportive services, individualized instruction, and accommodations they need to succeed in the regular classroom.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.