389 Ill. App. 3d 579 - People v. Bean’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 2010
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 183 Ill. 2d 366 - People v. Coleman · 215 Ill. 2d 427 - People v. Blair · Marino v. Ragen · 227 Ill. 2d 247 - People v. Delton · 174 Ill. 2d 320 - People v. Evans
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"`The trouble with Illinois is not that it offers no procedure. It is that it offers too many, and makes them so intricate and ineffective that in practical effect they amount to none. The possibility of securing effective determination on the merits is substantially foreclosed by the probability, indeed the all but mathematical certainty, that the case will go off on the procedural ruling that the wrong one of several possible remedies has been followed. * * * * * * If the federal guarantee of due process in a criminal trial is to have real significance in Illinois, it is imperative that men convicted in violation of their constitutional rights have an adequate opportunity to be heard in court. This opportunity is not adequate so long as they are required to ride the Illinois merry-go-round of habeas corpus, coram nobis, and writ of error before getting a hearing in a federal court.'" Bean, 389 Ill.App.3d at 588 , 329 Ill.Dec. 540 , 906 N.E.2d 738 (Stewart, J., dissenting), quoting Marino v. Ragen, 332 U.S. 561, 565-70 , 68 S.Ct. 240, 243-45 , 92 L.Ed. 170 , 174-76 (1947) (Rutledge, J., concurring, joined by Douglas and Murphy, JJ.).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.