Whiting v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
3 district · 53 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably Longshore v. State (2007), City of Bowie v. MIE, Properties, Inc. (2007)
3 district · 53 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Katz v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Rakas v. Illinois · United States v. Chadwick · Smith v. Maryland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[AJlthough Whiting did possess a subjective expectation of privacy ... his expectation of privacy was not objectively reasonable, and as a result, he did not have standing under the Fourth Amendment to challenge the searches.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Knowledge and consent are elements of acquiescence.”); see also Pence v. Langdon, 99 U.S. 578, 581 , 25 L.Ed. 420 (1878) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.