Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 389 Md. 570 - Lawson v. State

Lawson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

85
cited by 85 later decisions
1
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

85 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 85 later decisions — most recently May 2023 · most notably Lee v. State (2008), Kelly v. State (2006)

85 state decisions

460200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Pointer v. Texas · Kaczorowski v. Mayor of Baltimore · Dorsey v. State · Continental Casualty Co. v. UNR Industries, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““While arguments of counsel are required to be confined to the issues in the cases on trial, the evidence and fair and reasonable deductions therefrom, and to arguments of opposing counsel, generally speaking, liberal freedom of speech should be allowed. There are no hard-and-fast limitations within which the argument of earnest counsel must be confined—no well-defined bounds beyond which the eloquence of an advocate shall not soar. He may discuss the facts proved or admitted in the pleadings, assess the conduct of the parties, and attack the credibility of witnesses. He may indulge in oratorical conceit or flourish and in illustrations and metaphorical allusions.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'where it appears that the remarks of the prosecutor actually misled the jury or were likely to have misled or influenced the jury to the prejudice of the accused.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the severity of the remarks, the measures taken to cure any potential prejudice, and the weight of the evidence against the accused.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.