Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 389 P2D 1002 - Clouse v. State

Clouse v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
October 2001
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently October 2001

20 state decisions

18019641970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 94 Okla. Crim. 359 - Jones v. State · 3 Okla. Crim. 666 - Fooshee v. State · 145 Okla. Crim. 147 - White v. State · Hudson v. State · 47 Okla. Crim. 204 - Basham v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . this Court does not have the power to modify a sentence unless we can conscientiously say that under all the facts and circumstances the sentence is so excessive as to shock the conscience of the Court. . . .” (Citations omitted)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““. . . The rule is well settled that if from all the facts and circumstances attending the killing the jury can reasonably and satisfactorily infer the existence of the premeditated design or intention to kill, they will be warranted in so doing. ...” (at page 1006)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““Where there is competent evidence in the record from which the jury could reasonably conclude that the defendant was guilty as charged, the Court of Criminal Appeals will not interfere with the verdict, even though there is a sharp conflict in the evidence and different inferences may be drawn therefrom, since it is the exclusive province of the jury to weigh the evidence and determine the facts.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.