Silverton v. Marler’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
2 district · 28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently August 2013 · most notably RLR v. State (1971), Pepsi Cola Bottling Co. of Anchorage, Inc. v. Superior Burner Service Co. (1967)
2 district · 28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Messenger v. United States · Leege v. Martin · Lynch v. L. B. Sprague, Inc. · 193 F. Supp. 727 - Hoffman v. Wair · 57 F. Supp. 793 - Yudin v. Carroll
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Actions to be brought in two years. No person may bring an action (1) for libel, slander, assault, battery, seduction, false imprisonment, or for any injury to the person or rights of another not arising on contract and not specifically provided otherwise; (2) upon a statute for a forfeiture or penalty to the state; or (3) upon a liability created by statute, other than a penalty or forfeiture; unless commenced within two years.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Rule-Making Power. The supreme court shall make and promulgate rules governing the administration of all courts. It shall make and promulgate rules governing practice and procedure in civil and criminal cases in all courts. These rules may be changed by the legislature by two-thirds vote of the members elected to each house.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Upon the filing of the complaint the clerk shall forthwith issue a summons and deliver it for service to a peace officer or to a person specially appointed to serve it. Upon request of the plaintiff separate or additional summons shall issue against any defendants.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Coughlan v. Coughlan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.