Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 389 SO2D 1028 - Cox v. State

Cox v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 1984
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Suggs v. State · 353 So. 2d 664 - Thompson v. State Ex Rel. Mitchell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To allow the state to hide behind the technical requirements of the rule would undermine the constitutional guarantee of a speedy trial. * * * * * * This omission, while technical, is not substantive and should not excuse the state's failure to commence the action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.