Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 389 So. 2d 1302 - State v. Johnson

389 So. 2d 1302 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

52 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably 428 So. 2d 444 - State v. Seiss (1983), 823 So. 2d 877 - State v. Bridgewater (2002)

52 state decisions

2901980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Lee · 347 So. 2d 483 - State v. Anthony · 381 So. 2d 408 - State v. McIntyre · State v. Austin · 274 So. 2d 179 - State v. St. Amand

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"... Rather the right to choose one's attorney is a right to be exercised at a reasonable time, in a reasonable manner, and at an appropriate stage within the procedural framework of the criminal justice system. There is no constitutional right to make a new choice of counsel on the very date the trial is to begin, with the attendant necessity of a continuance and its disrupting implications to the orderly trial of cases. Once the trial day has arrived, the question of withdrawal of counsel rests largely within the discretion of the trial judge.... This court has frequently upheld the trial court's denial of motions for continuances or withdrawal of counsel made on the day of trial when defendant is dissatisfied with his present attorney but had ample opportunity to retain private counsel...."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “While a defendant's right to the counsel of his choice is firmly established in our law, that right may not be used to obstruct the orderly procedure in our courts nor to interfere with the fair administration of justice, and this Court has long so ruled. State v. Lee, 364 So.2d 1024 (La. 1978); State v. Anthony, 347 So.2d 483 (La.1977); State v. Frezal, 278 So.2d 64 (La.1973)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Greater proof of knowing and intelligent waiver has been neither constitutionally nor jurisprudentially required.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.