Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 389 SO2D 352 - State v. Barnett

State v. Barnett’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
May 1999
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 921 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 7342

Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Chimel v. California · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Boyd v. United States · Bumper v. North Carolina

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Close scrutiny of traffic in second-hand goods is undeniably of central importance to state efforts in discouraging burglaries, thefts, and robberies, serious crimes that can be violent. Large interests are at stake, and inspection directly furthers those interests since it tends to limit access to channels through which thieves may safely convert stolen property into cash.” 389 So.2d at 356 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““.. . The provisions of this Part shall not apply to the retail jewelry, automobile, furniture, and antique business."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.