389 So. 2d 372 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
45 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably State v. Smith (1983), 450 So. 2d 621 - State v. Jackson (1984)
45 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Michelson v. United States · 337 So. 2d 1177 - State v. Marks · State v. Holstead · 307 So. 2d 594 - State v. Banks · People v. Yoshio Futamata
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) that there is no question as to the fact of the subject matter' of the rumor, that is, of the previous arrest, conviction, or other pertinent misconduct of the defendant; (2) that a reasonable likelihood exists that the previous arrest, conviction or other pertinent misconduct would have been bruited about the neighborhood or community pri- or to the alleged commission of the offense on trial; ■ (3) that neither the event or conduct nor the rumor, concerning it occurred at a time too remote from the present offense; (4) that the earlier event or misconduct and the rumor concerned the specific trait involved in the offense for which the accused is on trial; and ■ (5) that the examination will, be conducted in the proper form, that is: ‘Have you heard,’ etc., not ‘Do you know,’ etc.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“the witness should not be asked `if he knows' that the accused has committed such other crimes, but only whether he `has heard' that defendant has committed particular acts inconsistent with the reputation vouched for on direct.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“convictions, arrests, or other misconduct”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.