Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 389 So. 2d 597 - Tinker v. State

389 So. 2d 597 - Tinker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 1983
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Lipscomb · McAdory v. State · 368 So. 2d 568 - McBryar v. State · Nickerson v. State · Ex Parte McBryar

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Error which might be prejudicial in a close case does not require a reversal when evidence of guilt is strong.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.