Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 389 So. 2d 696 - Royal v. State

389 So. 2d 696 - Royal v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
February 1997
most recently cited

19 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is no provision in the Rules of Criminal Procedure for the subsequent enhancement of a legal sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.