Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 389 U.S. 40 - Roberts v.

Roberts v.’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

953
cited by 953 later decisions
53
cited 53 times by the Supreme Court
32
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

376 federal appellate · 55 district · 245 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 953 later decisions (53 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2023 · most notably San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez (1973), Rose v. Lundy (1982)

376 federal appellate · 55 district · 245 state decisions — followed in 32 states

49301967197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Second Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · Brown v. Allen · Draper v. Washington · Harrison v. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 953 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Our decisions for more than a decade now have made clear that differences in access to the instruments needed to vindicate legal rights, when based upon the financial situation of the defendant, are repugnant to the Constitution.”
    22 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We can conceive of no reason why the State would wish to burden its judicial calendar with a narrow issue the resolution of which is predetermined by established federal principles.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “to require repetitious applications to state courts.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.