Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 389 U.S. 477 - Wirtz v.

Wirtz v.’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

264
cited by 264 later decisions
17
cited 17 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
August 2020
most recently cited

106 federal appellate · 24 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 264 later decisions (17 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2020 · most notably Dunlop v. Bachowski (1975), Wirtz v. Local 153 Glass Bottle Blowers Association (1968)

106 federal appellate · 24 district · 5 state decisions

9301968197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedW. Willard Wirtz v. Local Union No. 125 (from Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 481 · 29 U.S.C. § 482 · 29 U.S.C. § 521

Relies on National Licorice Co. v. National Labor Relations Board · Wirtz v. Local 153 Glass Bottle Blowers Association · Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. City of Dallas · National Labor Relations Board v. Fant Milling Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 264 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “which the union had a fair opportunity to consider and redress in connection with a member's initial complaint.”
    17 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The Act was not designed merely to protect the right of a union member to run for a particular union office in a particular election.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““ * * * no view on the merits of the Secretary’s argument that a member’s protest triggers a § 402 enforcement action in which the Secretary would be permitted to file suit challenging any violation of § 401 discovered in his investigation of the member’s complaint.” (Emphasis ours) p. 482, 88 S.Ct. p. 641.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.