Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 A.3d 669 - State v. Smith

State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Mattatall · State v. Gomez · State v. Clark · State v. Snow · State v. Heredia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]f the trial justice has complied with this procedure and articulated adequate reasons for denying the motion, his or her decision will be given great weight and left undisturbed unless the trial justice overlooked or misconceived material evidence or otherwise was clearly wrong.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.